Session 51 — June 2019

Frederic observes that older recordings about manifesting one's brilliance and removing separation from the Self seem to be the same teaching as the current material on the spiritual aspect of daily existence, only from another angle and somewhat broader.

The Wonders reply that every choice, exploration and allowance of freedom deepens and broadens the person, so although the words may sound the same the content is not: earlier words were designed to get past the walls he had then, while current words address the different walls he has now.

They ask how deep and broad he wants to go without limiting himself through his mind's definition of reality via judgment, fear and guilt, and note that the sessions are guided by the participant's own state: fear in the moment is what gets addressed, openness allows more to be expressed.

They caution that this cannot remain a mental conceptualization but must be a willingness in all of him, since he is physical, mental, emotional and manifested spiritual, and he tends to explore through the mind alone.

On his remark that he will likely be discussing the same thing again years from now from yet another perspective, they say that is the limitlessness of the universe: his point does not change relative to the whole, but as he broadens he allows more of the universe to participate with him.

They add that as judgment falls away existence becomes simpler, and that simplicity is precisely what is called depth, while complexity takes one away from one's own depth.

Frederic asks about the layers of self and how strongly they influence each other, noting that physically he perceives a slowing metabolism with age while other aspects of himself feel better, suggesting the connection between aspects is not absolute.

The Wonders answer that all aspects interrelate completely, and that what he observes as deterioration of the body is an observation built on a lifetime of judgments and justifications that have created psychologies and belief structures in his ego personality which he is still unwilling to remove because they help him navigate third dimensional reality.

They pose a scenario: if he realized without doubt that his physical representation has nothing to do with time but with choice, yet could not convince his wife, child or parents of that realization, his ego personality would remain attached to their validation and he would not truly let go, so he would still manifest a physicality perceived as aging.

They enumerate his attachments - his name, his parents and birth, his wife, child, dog and cat - explaining that these attachments define his personality and ego and give him a sense of completion and beingness, so letting go of them in order to manifest his true physicality would be a shock to mind, ego and personality and would separate him from the very reality he wants to participate in.

In the closing reflection after the session, this is restated: to manifest limitlessness in third dimensional reality one would have to release the attachment to being part of that reality, and human consciousness is generally not willing to do so, which is why people stay within the framework of growing, living and dying.